Review: The Story of O Part II
Neither a true
sequel to the first film nor is it based on author Pauline Reage’s own sequel
to “The Story of O”, this one has a board of directors trying to stop
being overtaken by businessman Pembroke. Someone comes up with the idea of
employing the special talents of the title character (played by Sandra Wey) to
embroil Pembroke in shocking scandal. Pembroke (played by the very
Pembroke-sounding Manuel de Blas) and his family (including wife Rosa Valenty
and daughter Carole James) move into a European estate, owned by O who will
find a way to bring out each of the family’s sexual secrets to be used for later
embarrassment (Blond adult son Christian Cid, for instance, seems to like both
oysters and snails if you catch Laurence Olivier-in-Sir Anthony Hopkins’
voice’s drift).
I didn’t really
find the first film appealing, as for me it’s hard to enjoy a sexy movie where
several of the participants don’t look to be enjoying themselves much. It’s
just not my kind of thing. This 1984 sequel of-sorts from director Eric Rochat
(who apparently went on to write and direct “Story of O: The Series” for
TV) and co-writer Jeffrey O’Kelly (amazingly the creator of an animated family
TV series called “Doctor Snuggles”!) isn’t quite as misogynistic as the
first film, as the title character (played this time by Sandra Wey) is much
more in a position of power. However, there are still moments which are really
foul, with Rosa Valenty in particular getting a pretty poor time of it. For the
most part, though, it plays more like an “Emmanuelle” film, really but
with O in the lead instead of Emmanuelle. However, it’s still staggeringly
boring, overly talky, badly acted, and full of repellent pigs or uninteresting
jerks. In fact, it’s too full of them, the film is grossly overpopulated,
making it hard to keep track of things for a while.
The bodies are
stunning when we see them on display, but the sex isn’t especially explicit or
memorable, I’m afraid. Too much rapid editing, lots of thrusting and reaction
shots, and sadly, some of the sex is fully-clothed. Yep. That’s what you want
in a softcore film, isn’t it? Way too much sheer clothing instead of actual
nudity in my book. The low point may be a lesbian scene that doesn’t involve
anyone relevant, has hardly any nudity, then turns into a threesome, before
eventually becoming a guy-on-guy scene. I’m not remotely homophobic, but there’s
a reason why there’s so few softcore erotica movies with guy-on-guy action
(i.e. The main audience tends to be aggressively heterosexual males). More
importantly, though, the scene manages to tease just about every possible
audience/demographic, leaving no one happy. This is an ill-advised mess with
too many characters and too many stories running concurrently to really keep up
with. It really needed a singular focus. The very 80s-looking Sandra Wey (think
Emma Samms meets Rachel Ward), seems to struggle with speaking English
expressively, and is quite forgettable in the lead. In fact, there’s long
stretches of dialogue in this where it’s almost impossible to decipher what
people are saying. Spaniard Manuel de Blas is chief offender in this respect, whilst
Carole James appears to be a legit British actress who made the occasional
appearance in mostly foreign films until 1987. It all takes an incredibly
nasty, if predictable turn in the ludicrous finale. Thinking about it, I can’t
imagine how anyone could be turned on by what happens in the latter stages.
Being turned on is kinda the point for this genre, right? The finale certainly
won’t please anyone, and in fact I’m not entirely certain it actually made any
bloody sense. What a mess! Amazing to read that Hans Zimmer (“Rain Man”,
“Inception”, “Man of Steel”) and Stanley Myers (“The Deer
Hunter”, “Dreamchild”, “Prick Up Your Ears”) composed the
score for such a trashy film.
Although there’s
some relatively explicit cunnilingus and attractive scenery, this is just too
nasty and moralistically murky for me. It’s also very silly which is just as
much of a killer for this kind of thing. Overpopulated, overly talky, and
overall boring as hell.
Rating: D
Comments
Post a Comment