Review: Supervixens
Mechanic Charles Pitts has a huge fight
with his extremely jealous wife SuperAngel (Shari Eubank) and storms off.
Meanwhile, a brutish redneck cop Sledge (character veteran Charles Napier) who
helped break up the argument, comes back to fornicate with Eubank. Unfortunately,
Sledge ain’t much of a red hot lover, and Eubank (foolishly) taunts him,
sending him into a violent, homicidal rage. Being the prime suspect in the
murder, Pitts gets the hell outta Dodge and encounters a string of oddly
Amazonian, sexpot gals along the way (including milkmaid SuperSoul,
SuperCherry, deaf-mute SuperEula, and finally SuperVixen, played again by
Eubank, who may or may not be SuperAngel reborn to seek revenge on the vile
Sledge. Still following me?). John LaZar, who was the uber-camp transsexual
rock guru Z-Man in “Beyond the Valley of
the Dolls”, appears here in a comparatively more ‘normal’ role as a guy who
offers Pitts a lift at one point. The unique (and here very scantily clad) Haji
turns up as a sympathetic bar owner named SuperHaji.
Truly bizarre, kinky 1975 comedic male
fantasy from the inimitable Russ Meyer (“Beyond
the Valley of the Dolls”, “Faster,
Pussycat! Kill! Kill!”) isn’t as much fun as “Beyond the Valley of the Dolls” (one of my all-time favourite
films), because Meyer goes way too far with the violence in one scene that
hurts the rest of the film. It is tainted as misogynistic and somewhat nasty
(the scene really does get foul), when the rest of the film is just juvenile,
silly (there’s just about every sex gag imaginable here, including the amazing Uschi
Digard as Swedish farm girl Supersoul, married to a protective old man played
by Meyer regular Stuart Lancaster) and almost good-natured. Actually, one could
argue that the film has some female empowerment stuff going on in the second
half (theorists still debate to this day whether Meyer was a feminist or a
misogynist dirty old man). Still, Charles Napier gives one of the most
frightening performances you are ever likely to see and his performance (the
best of his career, perhaps), along with the huge bazoongas (Digard’s in particular
are a sight for sore eyes…really, my eyes were actually hurting!) and Meyer’s
genuinely good eye for interesting visuals and locations (especially for a film
made for under $100,000) make it a film to see at least once.
If only Russ hadn’t have gone too far in
that one (admittedly unforgettable) scene, this could’ve been a lot of fun. As
is, that one scene taints the rest of the film, throwing the campy tone out of
whack entirely. The screenplay is by Meyer himself, his first solo screenwriting
effort, apparently. You’ll certainly never forget it, should you choose to
watch it, but you might come away feeling a tad depressed.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment