Review: Louis Theroux: My Scientology Movie
Full
disclosure: I’m far from a Louis Theroux fan. I’ve watched some of his docos on
TV, especially enjoyed his ones on “The Most Hated Family in America”, but I
generally find him creepy, impossibly smug, condescending, and irritatingly
insincere. With this 2016 doco on The Church of Scientology he has, for me
reached his nadir. 2015 gave us a really terrific documentary on Scientology
with “Going Clear”, 2016 gives us Louis and this useless piece crap
directed by John Dower. You see, “Going Clear” was an interesting and
informative documentary, despite the seemingly secretive nature of the Church
of Scientology. There’s plenty of meat to chew on, and quite a number of
talking heads to offer their insight. Our chap Louis, having met resistance and
restriction in his pursuit of making a documentary about Scientology, got
pretty much bugger all, and decides to press on making the movie anyway. It’s
idiotic, Louis and Dower should’ve cut their losses and made a different film,
because what he comes up with here is almost less than nothing. They had to
know going in that they weren’t going to have a lot to work with, surely.
Louis
has been critical of the ‘talking heads’ approach of “Going Clear”, but
his alternative is to show footage of real-life statements from
Scientologists…and then gives us completely unconvincing re-enactments of the
footage we’ve already seen. He hires ‘actors’ to play Scientology head David
Miscavige and star recruit Tom Cruise like he’s making a feature film. The
thing is, though, he’s really not. It’s just shit he’s putting into his
documentary to fill time because he couldn’t really make the movie he wanted to.
It’s desperate, stupid, and pointless filler all because Louis couldn’t get
enough real access to the Church and its members. Fine, don’t make the fucking
movie then, right? Nah, Louis doesn’t work like that, because he’s an insincere,
passive aggressive twat. So he goes ahead and makes a smart-arsey documentary
about making a mockumentary based on real footage he’s also showing us
for…reasons, I guess.
His
one real ‘source’ here is ex-Scientology 2nd in Command Marty
Rathbun, but he doesn’t make the best use of him or his insight for the most
part. In fact, Marty is on hand to help out in the re-enactments and coach
performances from the ‘actors’. Theroux tries to call the mock ‘tech’
sessions/re-enactments ‘squirreling’, which is a term used to describe
unsanctioned Scientology practices. Nope, you’re just making shit up and
re-enacting stuff on camera. That’s not the same thing. This is so infantile
(making “South Park” look rather sophisticated, really), thoroughly
beneath Louis Theroux, who although I’m not a fan, has done much, much better
than this shit. It doesn’t even play remotely like any of his other
documentaries (at least not his more serious ones), it’s completely different
and not in any good or productive way. All of the paranoid ‘I’m being
followed!’ stuff is just made up bullshit that a pro like Theroux should
consider well beneath him. Scientology is crazy and suspicious enough that he
didn’t need to make crap up, too.
I’m
sorry, but this film shouldn’t have been released. It’s an insult to not only a
paying audience (thankfully I saw it on television, albeit pay TV), but frankly
any audience to put something like
this out there. There’s some brief interview stuff like a traditional Theroux
doco, but not nearly as much as usual. Surely even Louis has to be kind of
embarrassed by this film. It’s not even fucking funny. At all. The Church of
Scientology is a fascinating subject for a doco, “Going Clear” showed
that. Here the only interesting thing is Rathbun himself, and I don’t think
Theroux deserves the credit for that. Rathbun’s cagey, irritable, and you’re
never quite sure about him. Louis isn’t quite sure about him, though he
eventually kinda throws Rathbun under the bus a little bit by the end, which I
thought was at the very least rather uncharitable (I wouldn’t be surprised if
Theroux throws Dower under the bus for this pointless piffle).
A
useless, uninformative, unamusing load of nothingness from a filmmaker who
should know better than to press forward with a film when there’s clearly not
enough for him to work with to form a full-length documentary. Hell, the
employment of actors for the re-enactments pretty much serves to put the entire
thing into further question. This should never have seen the light of day, and
I don’t think Louis Theroux fans will disagree with me all that strenuously,
either.
Rating:
D
It's docu, not "doco". You know, like in DOCUmentary.
ReplyDeleteIt's docu, not "doco". You know, like in DOCUmentary.
ReplyDeleteActually it's 'doco', at least in Australia where I'm from that's the term. It's slang, or at least an abbreviation of sorts, so a bit lazy on my part I suppose.
ReplyDelete