Review: Don’t Breathe 2

Norman, AKA The Blind Man (Stephen Lang) lives with – and is overprotective of – his young adopted daughter (Madelyn Grace) living a relatively happy existence, though the girl is curious about her past and Norman has been a bit sketchy on the details. Enter a group of home invaders led by sleazy-looking Raylan (Brendan Sexton III, well-cast) who tussle with The Blind Man who does all he can to defend his home, but the invaders end up taking off with his daughter. They’re gonna regret that.

 

I thought the first “Don’t Breathe” was an effective piece of horror filmmaking despite not having a single likeable protagonist. It was hard to really care about anyone in that film when everyone on both sides was pretty undesirable. This 2021 sequel from director Rodo Sayagues and co-writer Fede Alvarez (who have swapped roles from the previous film) is essentially a re-working of the original concept to basically give me what I asked for the first time around. It’s still a flawed film, but for different reasons this time around. I’d probably rate the two films the same, at the end of the day.

 

The camerawork by Pedro Luque (who also shot the first “Don’t Breathe”) is terrific, a bit reminiscent of David Fincher’s “Panic Room”. For a film that depends on darkness, it’s well-lit enough still to see everything necessary. Like the first film it’s an effective piece of filmmaking but here the big difference is having a sympathetic child protagonist to gravitate towards and worry about. As for Stephen Lang’s Blind Man, he’s essentially a protagonist this time around too. He's still messed-up and a tough bastard, but not ‘creepy arsehole kidnapper’ messed-up this time around. Some won’t like the change, but it worked for me and Lang is solid in the part.

 

So far as flaws go, the only major one for me is the unfortunate reliance on ‘jump’ scares. It’s annoying. I suppose some will see originality as an issue here, as the film basically has the same idea seen from a slightly tweaked perspective, but I liked the tweak (it might remind you a bit of the differences between “The Purge” and “The Purge: Anarchy” in regards to genre changes). The film isn’t as tight as the first one, but given that the plot is a bit more expansive in scope, that’s understandable. It’s just that the first half of the film is more interesting and effective than the second when we get a location change and more focus on action thrills than horror chills.

 

More likeable characters than the first film, but with less tension and tightness, this sequel ends up pretty much on par with its predecessor. Both are solid, well-made films this one a touch too reliant on lazy ‘scare’ tactics for my personal taste. Still worth seeing, especially if you can try to forget everything about Lang’s character in the first film.  

 

Rating: B-

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Cinderella (1950)

The story of poor young Cinderella (voiced by Ilene Woods), treated as a servant by her nasty stepmother (voiced by Eleanor Audley), and dismissed by her thoroughly rotten, ugly stepsisters. Her only friends are a group of mice, who are forever being menaced by a cat named Lucifer (or as I call him, Grumpy Cheshire Cat). The King (hoping to find a wife for his charming son) is throwing a ball and every available young woman is invited to attend, and Cinderella is most excited to go. However, her stepmother and stepsisters do all they can to prevent this from happening. But with help from the mice and one fairy godmother (voiced by Verna Felton) later, and Cinderella looks set to attend the ball. You know the rest, folks.   Lovely 1950 Disney animated movie from directors Clyde Geronimi ( “Peter Pan” , “Lady and the Tramp” ), Wilfred Jackson ( “Fantasia” , “Alice in Wonderland” , “Peter Pan” ) & Hamilton Luske ( “Pinocchio” , “Fantasia” , “Peter Pan” ), that is a bit too s
Read more

Review: Eugenie de Sade

Eugenie (Soledad Miranda) makes a deathbed confession to author/biographer (Jesus ‘Jess’ Franco himself), recounting the tale of how her depraved stepfather (Paul Muller) groomed her into a life of depravity, debauchery, and murder.   Not to be confused with the similarly titled “Eugenie…The Story of Her Journey into Perversion” (by the same director) or “Justine de Sade” (which is not to be confused with Franco’s own “Justine” for that matter), this 1973 Marquis de Sade adaptation from writer-director Jesus Franco ( “99 Women” , “A Virgin Among the Living Dead” ) is perhaps the perfect marriage of Franco, sleazy material, and actors. Basically this is what Franco’s “She Killed in Ecstasy” might’ve been like if it were based on a Marquis de Sade work. There’s a few slow spots here and there, but overall I actually think this is Franco’s best film. Yes, even better than my previous choice “Vampyros Lesbos” , and better than his more ‘respectable’ films like “Count Dracula” (a
Read more