Review: Sanctum
Richard Roxburgh leads a
team of cave explorers in Papua New Guinea's Esa-ala caves who become trapped
after a tropical storm floods the caves and they need to work together to find
an escape route. Easier said than done, when interpersonal conflicts also flare
up considerably under the stress of the heightened situation. Rhys Wakefield is
Roxburgh’s estranged son who has practically no respect for his cold-hearted
father, who he sees as a needless risk-taker. Dan Wyllie is Roxburgh’s
long-time associate, Ioan Gruffudd is the schmuck millionaire funding the
expedition, and Alice Parkinson is his girlfriend. Andrew Hansen appears
briefly as a sort of communications/tech guy.
James Cameron is only an
executive producer of this 2011 cave exploring disaster film from director
Alister Grierson (the Aussie war pic “Kokoda”).
However, you’d swear he helmed the thing, that is the James Cameron of “Titanic” and “Avatar”, two of the most overblown,
empty spectacles of all-time. The spectacle here isn’t quite as large but it’s
just as empty. I didn’t see it in 3D, but as I always say, a film needs to work
in 2D first, and besides, the 3D photography would likely be the only 3D thing about this clichéd and
boring film. Based on the true experiences of co-writer Andrew Wight, the film
is unfortunately nothing you haven’t seen a million times before. Wight and
co-writer John Garvin might be cave diving enthusiasts, but the film is tired
and full of clichéd dialogue, not helped by a mostly stiff cast. The
cold-hearted adventurer father and his resentful son, the rich playboy who is
revealed to be entirely shallow, the grizzled veteran, etc. Hardly inspiring
stuff.
Although the obvious
comparison is to UK filmmaker Neil Marshall’s “The Descent” (or
maybe Cameron’s “The Abyss”, it
actually plays more like a schlocky 60s/70s disaster/adventure film (including
the guy who is gonna turn into Donald Pleasence from “Fantastic Voyage”), only most of those films
had a sense of fun, not to mention real stars. This one’s got Aussie actor
Richard Roxburgh, former Aussie soap star Rhys Wakefield, and import Ioan
Gruffudd playing an American. In an Australian film. Set in Papua New Guinea.
Gruffudd being Welsh, I couldn’t understand why American was the chosen accent.
Surely not commercialism, otherwise everyone would’ve been a Yank, and he’s
certainly not a big enough name for marquee value. It’s Roxburgh and Gruffudd
who cause the most concern amongst the cast. If better actors had been cast in
their roles, maybe something could’ve been salvaged here to make the film more
than just a pretty but empty piece of cardboard. Roxburgh is typically hammy
and overdoes the ocker accent to the extent that he sounds like he’s still
playing former Aussie PM Bob Hawke (and he was crap in that role too). Gruffudd’s
performance meanwhile is as flat as his attempt at an American accent. Every
time he opens his mouth with that fake-arse accent, it reminds me of how cheap
and second-rate this is, beneath the scenic veneer and James Cameron name
recognition. Personally I think both of these characters ought to have been
combined (and they kinda were, for Bill Paxton’s character in the somewhat
better “Vertical Limit”) to
save us the bother of putting up with two crap performances. Rhys Wakefield
showed talent in “The Black Balloon”, but here he’s saddled with an actively
unlikeable character who just yells and complains the whole damn film. Why turn
up then, dipshit? The best performance by far comes from Dan Wyllie, who begins
as the slobby comic relief, before becoming involved in the dramatics. His is
the one character you almost half care about. The rest are forgettable and just
around to die, basically, aside from political satirist/writer Andrew Hansen of
the shit-stirring “Chaser”
team from TV (more pranksters than political satirists) in a bit of stunt
casting that stands out like a sore thumb mostly because it appears Hansen is
just playing himself.
There’s something screwy
here in terms of the characters, of which there are way too many, resulting in
a lack of depth (and thus little audience engagement). I didn’t like any of
them, and don’t respect or interest in what they are doing, and thus it results
in great boredom for me. They could die? So what? Don’t go into the cave.
Problem solved. But it’s more than that. Take the Roxburgh character for
instance. The way he’s set up, it’s like he’s meant to be the villain of the
piece, or at least a heartless bastard. Unfortunately, aside from Roxburgh’s
awful performance, he’s actually right
and the rest of the characters are a bunch of pussies who have no business
being anywhere near a cave. I may not like or understand what these people do,
but at least Roxburgh understands the dangers and the risks (i.e. It’s stupid,
reckless, and scary). He’s harsh but his actions are ultimately necessary. Have
the other characters never watched a disaster movie before? Somehow, I don’t
think I was meant to look at things this way, but I did and combined with the
complete lack of interest in plot and characters, it made it impossible for me
to be invested in any of it. “The Descent”
worked because it was scary, tense, and had the nasty creatures. Simple cave
diving, routine dramatics, and a ridiculous body count aren’t nearly enough for
me.
Thankfully the locales and
cinematography by Jules O'Loughlin pick up some of the slack. I’m not sure how
it looked in 3D (impossibly dark, I’d wager, though at least it wasn’t a
post-conversion job), but in 2D, this looks bloody gorgeous. Both the interior
and exterior of the cave look magnificent, almost enticing actually (I’m not
quite that stupid, however). Given we’re in a cave and underwater much of the
time, it looked pretty damn good to me. Unfortunately, I just get so annoyed
when I see such a great location at the service of a shit screenplay. Is this
the best they could do? These guys might be able to cave-dive, but they know
nothing about making movies. If you’re of like mind to them, you might get more
out of this empty spectacle than I did. Good, strong music score by David
Hirschfelder (“Shine”),
though, I must say.
Rating: C
Comments
Post a Comment