Review: Date With an Angel

An accident sees angel Emmanuelle Beart plummeting from the heavens and into the swimming pool of Michael E. Knight, giving her broken wings as a result. While Knight helps the injured angel heal her wounds, his rich fiancĂ© Phoebe Cates discovers them together and thinks the worst. Cates’ advertising exec father David Dukes (perfect casting) meanwhile, sees dollar signs in the angel, as do Knight’s immature friends. For his part, Knight starts to actually fall in love with the angel.

 

There’s nothing inherently wrong with the premise of this 1987 hybrid of “Splash”, Frank Capra, and light 80s sex comedy. I can see how someone might’ve thought it a really good idea for a film, and perhaps it could’ve resulted in one. It’s just that the execution is really quite poor in this instance. Written and directed by Tom McLoughlin (“Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives”, of all films), it’s good-looking but dull, and so is leading man Michael E. Knight. Knight doesn’t bring much to the table here. It’s also completely unfunny, though I felt much the same about “Splash” I have to confess, and most people consider that a minor classic.

 

McLoughlin’s script is underdone and full of clichĂ©s and stereotypes and the two major actresses here are appallingly served by the script. A blonde Emmanuelle Beart (who looks much better as a brunette if you ask me) has no chance in a practically mute role where she’s basically just an image or object. It’s so bizarre and demeaning to see the very talented and smouldering French actress playing a mute angel here when you look at the rest of her perfectly fine career. Yes, she’s often an object of desire in other films, but usually she gets a bit more to chew on (she was sensational in the ultimately frustrating “Nathalie…”). Here it's pretty much impossible to form a connection with the angel because she has no voice and no personality. She’s a fantasy object, albeit a beautiful one. I needed more than that. Even more poorly treated is poor Phoebe Cates. Every heterosexual male’s favourite early-to-mid 80s crush (Damn you, Kevin Kline!) she’s stuck in a role that is almost entirely comprised of being angrily jealous, screaming, or both at the same time. She starts out likeable enough, but by the climax she has descended into a shrieking, vengeful harpy. If it’s meant to be funny, the only time she even remotely earns a chuckle is when she drunkenly puts her panties on over her jeans. Think about that (and not in a pervy way). Meanwhile, The FX by Richard Edlund (“Star Wars”, “Ghostbusters”, “Big Trouble in Little China”) are fine for the time, but you’re gonna need to give me more than just a pretty film with pretty people.

 

Although not an appalling film, this comedy-fantasy is very short on the laughs and frankly a bit on the nose in its depiction of female characters. A boring leading man doesn’t help. I can see why this one was never particularly popular. Pretty though, in an overly soft focus kind of way.

 

Rating: C-

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Review: Cinderella (1950)

Review: Eugenie de Sade