Review: The Forever Purge
Purge Night is back, and a particularly nasty group of
Purge Night enthusiasts in Texas have decided that one night of purging simply
isn’t enough for them. They want it to last forever. We follow the lives of
well-meaning, wealthy rancher Will Patton and his family as well as Patton’s
illegal Mexican immigrant horse wrangler/farm hand and his family, the latter
of whom are staying at a local compound for Mexican immigrants during Purge
Night (walled, of course). After successfully surviving the night, both groups go
back to their daily lives. However, they are soon greeted with the horrific
realisation that hell on earth isn’t set to end anytime soon. Patton’s family
are held hostage by their (white) farm hands, who want the ranch for
themselves, envious of Patton’s wealth. Also, these forever purge people seem
hell-bent on ridding America of any non-white elements. Josh Lucas plays
Patton’s less ingratiating son, who escapes their captors along with his
pregnant wife, his sister, and two of the migrant workers. They survived the
night, but can they survive forever?
I really enjoyed the first two “Purge” movies,
was greatly disappointed with “Election Year”, and still haven’t seen “The
First Purge” as of September 2022. Yet, here I am having seen this 2021
film from debut English-language director Everardo Valerio Gout (A Mexican
filmmaker who comes from a background largely in TV) and writer-creator James
DeMonaco (who wrote and directed the first three films). I think I’ll try to
track down “The First Purge” because this is at least a step back in the
right direction for the franchise, so I’m keen to see if that trend started
here or there.
The themes here seem to be the worst aspects of
America – racial hatred, anti-immigration, a frankly morbid love of guns, and
the economic divide. Also, the setting is Texas. Purge Night would be scary
enough to begin with, but can you imagine being stuck in Texas with all the
gun-totin’ yahoos? With the greatest respect to the non gun-totin’ yahoos of
Texas, no thank you. The rural setting makes for a nice difference from the
first three more urban-set films. For the most part, that setting is the chief
difference here as the plot seems to be a combination of the first two films.
Instead of an African-American resistance leader, this time we get a Native
American one, and the villains are basically white supremacists. Still,
original or not, at least it's an interesting plot and not delivered
with quite the same ham fist as “Election Year”. There is also one more
wrinkle, and it’s a doozy. As the title suggests, the villainous purge
enthusiasts in this one aren’t satisfied with merely one night of satiating
their lust for violence and chaos. Oh no, they plan on going forever. It was
inevitable and it’s kinda terrifying to ponder such violent, sadistic
lawlessness. So I really liked that idea.
I was on board with this film, but I must admit that
killing off one of the most sympathetic characters 30 minutes in was a bit of a
disappointment. Still, I liked some of the concepts here and the director gives
it a good pulse/energy, so it’s definitely closer in quality to the first films
than the uneven “Election Year”. There’s a funny/creepy bit where a crim
with a swastika on his face can identify the guns being used by the sounds the
guns make. There’s also a great shot of all the flames, smoke and chaos from a
bit of an elevated height.
I think if you enjoyed “The Purge: Anarchy” you
should probably like this one, because there’s some real similarities here,
just less urban hell and more rural hell. I think it’s a bit lesser than the
first two films, but it’s still interesting enough to warrant at least a (slightly)
soft recommendation.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment