Review: Four-Sided Triangle
Childhood friends Stephen Murray,
John Van Eyssen, and Barbara Payton are working on a scientific project – a
duplication device. Murray has long harboured feelings for Payton, but the
latter becomes engaged to Van Eyssen. What is a scientist with a duplication
device and a love triangle to do? James Hayter plays the resident doctor in the
small town the characters live in.
You won’t find too many films that
director Terence Fisher (“Stolen Face”, “The Curse of Frankenstein”,
“Horror of Dracula”) also worked on the screenplay for. In fact, there’s
only two, the mediocre 1953 “Mantrap” and this 1953 sci-fi/drama, both
for Hammer Studios. To be honest, it’s pretty clear that Fisher’s strengths
aren’t in screenwriting, but this is by far the better of the two films. James
Hayter and his narration are terrific, the film has a cosy, small village
family movie vibe, at least at first. Imagine “The Fly” done by Frank
Capra but set in England, and you’ll have some idea. There’s also some interest
in seeing how an idea like this one was handled in 1953, like a dry run for
what Hammer would give us in a few years with their “Frankenstein” films.
The formula still has some kinks, but the bare bones are evident here in this
man messing with the ‘natural order of things’ story. The lab equipment seen in
the film was certainly a sign of things to come for Hammer.
The best thing here is the B&W
cinematography by Reginald Wyer (“Mantrap”, “Spaceways”, “The
Brigand of Kandahar”, “Night of the Big Heat”), which is stunning. The
three main characters are predominantly likeable, but only one of them is interesting
(the one played very well by Stephen Murray) and the film’s science is just a
touch too dumb, even for science fiction. The conceit of creating
a duplicate as done here, while interesting, is scientifically silly beyond
belief. Also, the fact that the film is telling this story from a very 1950s male
POV, doesn’t help in making this one terribly easy to watch in 2026. The lead
female character really ought to have more depth to her, even for a 1950s
British film. Feminists might be – rightly – apoplectic over this film’s lack
of agency for women, and Murray’s character sure goes into some very disturbing
territory.
A flawed, somewhat outdated, but
still quite interesting and well-shot sci-fi drama with a nice small-town vibe.
This isn’t top-tier Hammer but it’s worthy of a soft recommendation at least so
long as you can consider the era in which it was made. The screenplay is by
Fisher and Paul Tabori (“Mantrap”, “Spaceways”) from the William
F. Temple novel.
Rating: B-
Comments
Post a Comment