Review: Cash on Demand
Set two days before Christmas at a small local English
bank managed by the fastidious Fordyce (Peter Cushing), who runs a tight ship
with little room for warmth or Christmas cheer. As we meet him Fordyce is
chewing out the chief clerk (Richard Vernon) over his supposed bookkeeping
errors that the man has nonetheless fixed later. In the midst of all this a
rather charming man named Col. Gore Hepburn (Andre Morell), a supposed
insurance investigator arrives at the bank to check their security. However,
he’s not really an insurance investigator, and Fordyce’s stress levels are
about to go through the roof before the jolly fat man comes down the chimney on
Christmas Eve.
One of the very finest films from Hammer Studios, this
1961 heist-thriller from director Quentin Lawrence (a veteran of British TV) is
little-known but absolutely worthwhile. Based on a play by Jacques Gillies (a
Kiwi-born writer of mostly British TV) and scripted by David T. Chantler
(Hammer’s adaptation of “She”) and Lewis Greifer (“Up Jumped a
Swagman”), it’s really good and tight as hell. I have found my new
favourite unofficial Christmas movie here folks, and after seeing it for the
first time earlier in the year I re-watched it this morning alongside “First
Blood” (there’s Christmas decorations all through that one!). Peter Cushing’s
character here is essentially Mr. Scrooge, and Andre Morell’s bank robber plays
the part of the three ghosts.
It’s a very British way of doing a heist film,
starting off by involving us in the day-to-day running of the bank and its
various personnel. Peter Cushing is excellent as the humourless, fastidious
bank manager whom no one else likes all that much (audience included). Under
the circumstances imposed upon him you end up feeling sorry for the guy,
despite Cushing not really making any attempt to soften the character. His fear
and panic are wonderfully realised by the veteran character actor, and all of
the different emotions he conveys seem consistent with the character. It might
be one of his best-ever performances. Richard Vernon is terrific in support
too, and apparently was never young even in 1961. Some people are just born
middle-aged I guess. The real revelation for me however is Andre Morell as the
intended bank robber in a grim-faced, scene-stealing turn. He’s actually quite
chilling in the part, with his gentlemanly façade dropping quite early to
reveal an absolute ruthlessness. It might just be the best performance I’ve
ever seen from him. He’s a good actor, but I honestly didn’t think he had a
turn like this in him.
Despite being all talk, the film has an immediacy to
it, taking place over a very short period of time. If there’s any flaw at all
it’s that the morality of the time dictates a less bold ending than it
potentially could have in a more permissive era. Even then, I’m not sure if
that even counts as a flaw. For what might’ve been a back-half of a double
bill, this tense, well-acted heist film is better than a lot of Hammer’s ‘A’
pictures. Andre Morell is especially outstanding. Must-see, this is Top 5
Hammer for me.
Rating: B+
Comments
Post a Comment