Review: Pearl

Set multiple decades before “X”, Mia Goth stars as Pearl whose husband (Alistair Sewell) is off fighting in WWI. Pearl is stuck doing chores for her humourless mother (Tandi Wright) and tending to her decrepit, disabled father (Matthew Sunderland), whilst dreaming of being a dancer and leaving the family farm. Pearl also starts seeing a projectionist (David Corenswet). Oh, and she’s also coming apart at the seams and on the verge of a homicidal rampage.

 

You’re either on the same wavelength as director Ti West and co-writer/star Mia Goth or you’re…me. Yeah, I’m gonna annoy you today, apologies in advance. Seriously, I hated this 2022 film before the end of the opening credits. That’s a new record for me. Mr. West needs to learn that if you put ‘starring’ before every actor in the credits, you diminish the meaning of that word. Meanwhile, the colour, font, and music gave off Douglas Sirk vibes a little too much for my palette, and Mia Goth’s performance is far too ‘put-on’. Again, this was before the end of the opening credits.

 

I’m sure West and Goth thought they were super clever here blending “The Wizard of Oz” (one shot is a direct steal), Douglas Sirk and horror movies, but I found the entire experience overdone and annoying. Imagine John Waters and David Lynch combining to remake Tobe Hooper’s “Eaten Alive” as a musical and throwing Lizzie Borden in as the lead character. That’s this movie, and it probably appeals to a lot of people who praise films like “Eraserhead” and “Mandy” simply for being weird and a little different. I need more than different. It also needs to be good, and like those two films this isn’t anywhere near good (if the most palatable of the three perhaps). Hell, I don’t even think it’s that different. If you think about it, to make another cinematic comparison the film is just Amish “May”. Both are female names as movie titles, both are social outcasts with unusual upbringings etc, both are essentially horror movies. One of them is a very good movie, the other one is whatever the hell this thing is. The character in “May” was eccentric but still felt pretty real, you felt something for her, and the film was also darkly funny at times. Pearl is a boring caricature played boringly by Goth (who I liked in “Infinity Pool” for at least the majority of its length), with a put-on cornfed ‘aw shucks’ accent that gets old instantly. When she runs down a list of her flaws, I couldn’t help but agree with all of them. Was I supposed to enjoy watching her torture animals or take baths in front of decrepit relatives? ‘coz that’s mostly what we get here. The majority of the first hour should’ve been done in half that time. This thing is snail-like in its pacing. It’s one-note and repetitive, and Tandi Wright is particularly appalling as Pearl’s mother.

 

I love horror movies but I didn’t see any entertainment value here. I can appreciate some of the artistic quality even though I think it’s completely overdone. Entertainment, though? Where? Why? 93% and 83% on Rotten Tomatoes tells me I’m wrong about this one both with critics and audiences. That’s OK guys, you can have this movie. You’re welcome to it. I don’t need to be a part of this particular cult. It’s just not my thing, but I need to score accordingly to my personal taste/viewing experience.

 

Rating: D

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Jinnah

Review: Bloodbrothers

Review: Cinderella (1950)