Review: Annabelle


Set in the Manson era, Ward Horton and Annabelle Wallis play expectant parents. Wallis collects porcelain dolls, and Horton brings home another one for her collection. It’s bigger than her other dolls, and frankly a whole lot uglier. One night, it appears that something awful is happening next door, and whilst Horton goes to investigate, Wallis is attacked by a crazy cultist woman who grabs the doll. After spending some time in hospital recovering from this frightening incident, Wallis has her baby and comes home. Eventually, though, work sees the family move to a new town. And that’s when spooky stuff really starts happening, and Wallis starts to suspect the ugly frigging doll might be somewhat the cause of it.

 

I was a bit ‘meh’ on “The Conjuring”. It came with a lot of hype, and was mildly effective, but I felt its split narrative deflated a lot of the tension/terror for me. However, that film is a damn masterpiece compared to this completely lifeless, dreary 2014 prequel from director John R. Leonetti, a noted cinematographer (He shot “The Conjuring”, and the superior “Insidious”, and interestingly he also shot “Child’s Play 3”).

 

Right off the bat this is yet another film that just doesn’t understand that if you’re gonna make a movie about a creepy doll, you need to make it look convincing enough as something that at some point in time was seen as appropriate for children. “Child’s Play” got that balance right, but this one fouls it up by giving us a hideous-looking creation that you just don’t buy into from the get-go. The other, ‘normal’ dolls in the film are far creepier despite not being designed to be. That’s not the only thing laid on too thick here, as bringing up the Manson family and having the Mia Farrow-lookalike Annabelle Wallis (Weird coincidence, huh?) attacked by crazies whilst heavily pregnant is just a little too much, really. I did appreciate, however, that the scene was refreshingly bloody, which I wasn’t expecting from a film like this. Oh, and having Wallis actually play a character called Mia does NOT make this “Rosemary’s Baby”, thank you very much. Not even close.

 

Annabelle Wallis and Ward Horton are woefully uninteresting in the leading roles. Completely deprived of charisma or presence, they create the most boring screen couple since “Manhattan Murder Mystery”. They are so boring that Wallis’ pregnant cravings are exactly what you think they’d be: Pickles and mustard. Woah, that’s crazy man! Wallis in particular is so dreary and soft-spoken I was worried she was in a semi-comatose state or something. Speak up, woman! Alfre Woodard is a helluva actress when allowed to be, and she does not need to appear in something like this that wastes her as the token ethnic character who just so happens to be an expert in spooky gobbledegook. Ugh. Really? In 2014? Geez.

 

Even the film’s chief asset ends up ironically sinking the film completely: The cinematography. Shot not by Leonetti himself but James Kniest (in his most notable assignment to date), it looks pretty amazing. Camera movement in particular is outstanding, and really works overtime. Leonetti and Kniest clearly know how to shoot and light a film, it’s a real show-reel in that sense. Unfortunately, it’s the wrong way to shoot and light this particular film. You find yourself constantly noticing the camerawork and lighting and frightfully disinterested in anything else. Sure, the story kinda sucks and the characters are a chore, but the cinematography ends up being the best and worst thing about the film, really (Well, actually, the worst thing is that the doll never does anything in the film! Not one thing!). It just goes to show you that good cinematography can be just as much of a distraction as bad cinematography. But honestly, it’s the only thing worth noting in this dreary, disastrously boring and completely un-terrifying so-called horror film.

 

Mr. Leonetti hasn’t a clue how to direct a horror film and the lead actors are so godawful boring you find yourself yearning for Patrick Wilson. Think about that, people!

 

Rating: D+

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more