Review: Warriors of the Wasteland
Set in the post-apocalyptic future of…2019. A motley
gang called the Templars roams the landscape in an array of vehicles, with
their sole mission to wipe the land free of humanity. Well, except for
themselves, one presumes. The Templars, by the way, are an all-male gang.
Standing up against the likes of One (George Eastman) and his henchmen Shadow
(Ennio Girolami) and Mako (Massimo Vanni), is ex-Templar Skorpion (Giancarlo
Prete), who makes a reluctant alliance with former rival Nadir (Fred
Williamson) to take the Templars down as they target a small community of
pacifist religious folk. Anna Kanakis plays a slave woman Skorpion picks up
along the way.
AKA “The New Barbarians”, AKA “Mad Max 2”
melded with a spaghetti western. “Mad Max 2” was a big deal in Italy, it
seems. If you’re a film buff/movie lover such as myself, you’ll be aware that
Italian filmmakers ripped off “Mad Max 2” about a gazillion times over
the years. This 1983 blend of “Mad Max 2” and The Corman/Bartel cult
classic “Death Race 2000” (with a touch of “Escape From New York”)
is considered to be one of the best of the trashy subgenre of Italian
post-apocalyptic knock-offs. In my view it’s shy of being a good film in the
traditional sense. There’s certainly not much in the way of story or character,
and I can’t quite give it a full recommendation. Still, on a trashy B-level it
is mostly very watchable stuff as a curio.
It looks a whole heck of a lot cooler than its budget
likely should’ve rendered it. Director Enzio G. Castellari (“Street Law”,
“Keoma”, “1990: The Bronx Warriors”) and his co-writer Tito Capri
(“Escape From the Bronx”, “Code Name: Wild Geese”, “The
Commander”) get points for the fun post-apocalyptic vehicles and bizarro
costuming and hairstyling. It’s got plenty of that, as well as a lot of George
Eastman and Ennio Girolami glowering – intensely in the former’s case. There’s
entertainment value in that, too. The violence and gore are a lot of fun when
we get it – a nice exploding head in particular, though the decapitation to a
very obvious department store mannequin is probably a different kind of
amusing. The action is good fun, though you do wish more was done with ice-cool
Fred Williamson and his slick crossbow. His performance stands out despite
being far from his best, it’s just that he’s a better and more charismatic
actor than anyone else here. Williamson (enjoying himself it seems) looks
awesomely ridiculous yet kinda cool in his shiny armoured outfit, but he
doesn’t fire the damn crossbow often enough. That thing was awesome and we
should’ve been seeing a lot more of it in action.
If anything, I wished it had been trashier and more
violent than it is. However, there’s plenty of action and explosions so you
never get bored. There’s a bizarro torture scene in the second half which sure
was something. In fact, the strangeness and camp is what really keep this one
afloat along with the action. In other words, it’s kind of amusing to watch a
film being re-imagined through the eyes of a filmmaker from another nation. For
instance, machine guns in this film make laser gun ‘pew pew’ sound effects, and
that’s just the most adorably weird thing ever. I should probably point out
though, that the original, rather stripped-back
“Mad Max” is by far my favourite of the four films to date, and
this is very much “Mad Max 2” done in Italy. Look out for the appalling
sex scene, shot behind a dirty-looking sheet of plastic lit green so that you
can’t see a damn thing.
Lead actor Giancarlo Prete (who had a role in “Ladyhawke”)
is rather good, he looks like a cross between Eric Bogosian and Peter Capaldi
from “Dr. Who”. Check out his bulletproof armour at the climax, it’s the
goofiest shit you’ll ever see. It’s a hoot and a half. To be honest though, the
only bad performance comes from lead actress Anna Kanakis. She’s not just bad,
she’s porno-bad. Eastman and the absolutely ridiculous-looking Girolami are far
from subtle, but they’re definitely amusing in the Vernon Wells mould.
A watchable B-movie that is quite bizarre and lively.
Plot, character, and dialogue are…minimalist, to be charitable. Worth a look
for the curious and never dull, but I can’t quite pluck up the courage
to give it a full recommendation. I have a reputation, y’know.
Rating: C+
Comments
Post a Comment